0.0030  %  smoothing coefficient (threshold = 0.0001)
0   %   remove points with large RMS misclosure  (y=0;n=1)
1.7 %  threshold on RMS misclosure (in rad) ?
1  % range and azimuth sampling ?
8 % iterations to correct unwrapping errors (y:nb_of_iterations,n:0)
1 % iterations to weight pixels of interferograms with large residual? (y:nb_of_iterations,n:0)
0.2 % Scaling value for weighting residuals (1/(res**2+value**2)) (in same unit as input files) (Must be approximately equal to standard deviation on measurement noise)
0 % iterations to mask (tiny weight) pixels of interferograms with large residual? (y:nb_of_iterations,n:0)
4 % threshold on residual, defining clearly wrong values (in same unit as input files)
1    %   elimination of outliers by the median ? (y=0,n=1)
liste_image_inv
0    % sort by date (0) ou by another variable (1) ?
liste_interf_inv
0   % interferogram format (RMG : 0; R4 :1) (date1-date2_pre_inv.unw or date1-date2.r4)
3100.   %  include interferograms with bperp lower than maximal baseline
1 % Weight input interferograms by coherence or correlation maps ? (y:0,n:1)
0 % coherence file format (RMG : 0; R4 :1) (date1-date2.cor or date1-date2-CC.r4)
1   %   minimal number of interferams using each image
1     % interferograms weighting so that the weight per image is the same (y=0;n=1)
0.5 % maximum fraction of discarded interferograms
0 %  Would you like to restrict the area of inversion ?(y=1,n=0)
1 735 1500 1585  %Give four corners, lower, left, top, right in file pixel coord
1  %    referencing of interferograms by bands (1) or corners (2) ? (More or less obsolete)
5  %     band NW -SW(1), band SW- SE (2), band NW-NE (3), or average of three bands (4) or no referencement (5) ?
1   %   Weigthing by image quality (y:0,n:1) ? (then read quality in the list of input images)
1   %  Weigthing by interferogram variance (y:0,n:1) ?  or user given weight (2)?
1    % use of covariance (y:0,n:1) ? (Obsolete)
0   % include a baseline term in inversion ? (y:1;n:0) Require to use smoothing option (smoothing coefficient) !
1   % smoothing by Laplacian, computed with a scheme at 3pts (0) or 5pts (1) ?
2   % weigthed smoothing by the average time step (y :0 ; n : 1, int : 2) ?
1    % put the first derivative to zero (y :0 ; n : 1)?